Sacks Tierney P.A.

Member of Meritas: 173 full-service law firms serving more than 200 markets worldwide

480-425-2600

Follow Sacks Tierney on Facebook

LinkedIn

Google+

 

 

James W. Armstrong

Jim Armstrong

Gaye L. Gould

Gaye Gould

Helen R. Holden

Helen Holden

Patty A. Ferguson

Patty Ferguson-Bohnee

 

LEGAL SERVICES

Appeals

Winning a case on appeal often requires skill, experience and strategy that differ dramatically from the qualities of an effective trial attorney

During the firm's 50-year history, Sacks Tierney's appellate lawyers have honed the art of appellate advocacy through dozens of arguments before the Arizona Court of Appeals, Arizona Supreme Court, U.S. Court of Appeals, and U.S. Supreme Court. We are highly skilled in the presentation of legal issues and arguments supporting our clients' positions in high-stakes controversy.

Article: Analyzing Cross-Appeals in Federal Court (2013)

REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED CASES

  • Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation & Drainage Dist. v. Robertson, 123 P.3d 1122 (Ariz. 2005)

  • Arizona Minority Coalition for Fair Redistricting v. Arizona Indep. Redistricting Comm'n., 121 F.3d 843 (Ariz. App. 2005)

  • Hibbs v. Winn, 542 U.S. 88 (2004)

  • In re Price Waterhouse Ltd., 202 Ariz. 397, 46 P.3d 408 (2002)

  • Beaudry v. Insurance Co. of the West, 203 Ariz. 86, 50 P.3d 836 (App. 2002)

  • In re Estate of Fogleman, 197 Ariz. 252, 3 P.3d 1172 (App. 2000)

  • Vallejo v. Department of Economic Security, 194 Ariz. 201, 979 P.2d 529 (App.1999)

  • Hospital Corp. of Northwest, Inc. v. Arizona Dep't of Health Services, 195 Ariz. 383, 988 P.2d 168 (App. 1999)

  • Keams v. Tempe Technical Institute, 110 F.3d 44 (9th Cir. 1997) 

  • Harris Trust Bank of Arizona v. Superior Court, 188 Ariz. 159, 933 P.2d 1227 (App. 1996)

  • In re Bowen, 198 B.R. 551 (9th Cir. Bankr. 1996)

  • ABC Supply, Inc. v. Edwards, 191 Ariz. 48, 952 P. 2d 286 (App. 1996)

  • J.D.S. v. Franks, 182 Ariz. 81, 893 P.2d 732 (1995)

  • Sabelko v. City of Phoenix, 68 F.3d 1169 (9th Cir. 1995)

  • Keams v. Tempe Technical Institute, Inc., 39 F.3d 222 (9th Cir. 1994)

  • J.D.S. v. Superior Ct., Cnty. of Maricopa, 182 Ariz. 98, 893 P.2d 749 (App. 1994)

  • Waste Mfg. & Leasing Corp. v. Hambicki,183 Ariz. 84, 900 P.2d 1220 (App. 1994)

  • Precision Components, Inc. v. Harrison, Harper, Christian & Dichter, P.C., 179 Ariz. 552, 880 P.2d 1098 (App. 1993)

  • Myers v. Wood, 174 Ariz. 434, 850 P.2d 672 (App. 1992)

  • Tracy v. Superior Court of Maricopa County, 168 Ariz. 23, 810 P.2d 1030 (1991)

  • Mandraes v. Hungerford, 127 Ariz. 585, 623 P.2d 15 (1981)

  • Greenfield v. Cheek, 122 Ariz. 70, 593 P.2d 293 (App.1978), approved and adopted, 122 Ariz. 57, 593 P.2d 280 (1979)

  • Sundown Imports, Inc. v. Arizona Department of Transportation, 115 Ariz. 428, 565 P.2d 1289 (App. 1977)

  • Application of Collins, 108 Ariz. 310, 497 P.2d 523 (1972)